5.4 Tool Selection Guide Beginner Free
Prerequisites: 5.1 IDE-Integrated Tools, 5.2 Terminal-Native Tools, 5.3 Cloud-Based AI Development
Why Do You Need It? (Problem)
Now that you've learned about 10+ AI coding tools, you face a new challenge:
Choice Paralysis
- Cursor, Windsurf, and Copilot all claim they're the best—who to trust?
- Is the free Trae enough? Or must I pay?
- Trying every tool is too costly
Too Many Tools, Lower Efficiency
- Installed 3 IDE tools, don't know which to open
- Terminal tools overlap with IDE tools
- Spend more time switching tools than using them
Different Roles, Different Needs
- Frontend developers need rapid UI generation
- Backend developers focus on business logic and databases
- DevOps engineers need to edit code directly on servers
- Product managers just want to quickly validate prototypes
Budget Constraints
- Students/individuals: free if possible
- Small teams: limited budget, need cost-effectiveness
- Large enterprises: focus on security and compliance
Goal of this section: Provide clear tool combination recommendations based on your role, scenario, and budget.
What Is It? (Concept)
Tool Selection Framework: 3 Dimensions × 2 Decisions
Decision Tree:
By Role Selection
Frontend Developers
Core Needs:
- Rapid UI component generation
- Responsive design and style adjustments
- Automatic component documentation
Recommended Combo:
| Tool | Purpose | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor or Windsurf | Daily coding, refactoring | $20 or $10/month |
| v0 | Rapid UI component generation | Free 200 credits |
| Cline (Optional) | Handle complex logic with Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Pay-per-use |
Workflow Example:
Need: Create user profile page
Step 1: Generate UI with v0
Prompt: "Design a user profile page with avatar, name, bio, social links"
→ Get React component code
Step 2: Integrate in Cursor
- Copy code generated by v0
- Use Cursor Agent to connect backend API
- "Modify this component to fetch data from /api/user and display"
Step 3: Optimize details
- Cursor Chat: "Add skeleton loading state"
- Cursor Chat: "Add edit mode to modify profile"Cost Analysis:
- Windsurf Pro: $10/month
- v0 Free: 200 credits/month (sufficient)
- Total: $10/month
Backend Developers
Core Needs:
- Business logic implementation
- Database query optimization
- API documentation generation
- Test case writing
Recommended Combo:
| Tool | Purpose | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor | Code writing, refactoring, testing | $20/month |
| Claude Code | Quick fixes on servers | $20/month (included in Claude Pro) |
Or Low-Cost Alternative:
| Tool | Purpose | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Cline | Agent programming in VS Code | Pay-per-use |
| Codex CLI | Quick queries in terminal | Pay-per-use |
| DeepSeek API | Low-cost model ($0.14/1M tokens) | ~$5/month |
Workflow Example:
Need: Optimize order query API performance
Step 1: Analyze in Cursor
"Analyze performance bottlenecks in app/api/orders.py"
→ Cursor points out: N+1 query problem, missing indexes
Step 2: Let Cursor optimize
"Refactor this API:
1. Use JOIN instead of N+1 queries
2. Add database indexes
3. Add caching (Redis)"
→ Cursor auto-modifies code and generates migration files
Step 3: Generate tests
"Generate unit tests and performance tests for this API"
→ Cursor creates tests/test_orders.pyCost Analysis:
- Option 1 (Cursor + Claude Code): $20/month (Claude Pro unlocks both tools)
- Option 2 (Cline + DeepSeek): ~$5/month
Full-Stack Developers
Core Needs:
- Frontend and backend development simultaneously
- Database model and API sync modifications
- End-to-end feature implementation
Recommended Combo:
| Tool | Purpose | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor (Agent Mode) | Multi-file editing, full-stack refactoring | $20/month |
| bolt.new (Optional) | Quick project scaffolding | Free/month |
Workflow Example:
Need: Add user favorite feature (frontend + backend + database)
Input in Cursor Composer (⌘ I):
"Add user favorite article feature:
1. Database: Create favorites table (user_id, article_id, created_at)
2. Backend: Add POST /favorites and DELETE /favorites/:id API
3. Frontend: Add favorite button in article list, call API on click
4. Real-time UI state update"
→ Cursor automatically:
- ✅ Creates database migration file
- ✅ Creates app/api/favorites/route.ts
- ✅ Modifies components/ArticleCard.tsx to add favorite button
- ✅ Adds state management (React Context or Zustand)
- ✅ Generates test cases
Done! One command implements end-to-end feature.Cost Analysis:
- Cursor Pro: $20/month
- bolt.new: Free (only for quick project generation)
- Total: $20/month
DevOps / SRE Engineers
Core Needs:
- Quick config modifications on servers
- Log analysis and troubleshooting
- Writing automation scripts
- Optimizing CI/CD pipelines
Recommended Combo:
| Tool | Purpose | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | Modify code/config on servers | $20/month |
| Codex CLI | Quick queries and script generation | Pay-per-use |
| MCP Tools (Optional) | Integrate Kubernetes, GitHub, Jira | Free |
Workflow Example:
# Scenario: Production CPU spike, need to investigate
# Step 1: SSH to server
ssh user@prod-server
# Step 2: Launch Claude Code
claude-code
# Step 3: Let AI help analyze
You: Analyze logs from the last hour, find cause of CPU spike
Claude:
I performed the following analysis:
1. ✅ Checked /var/log/app.log
2. ✅ Found many "Slow query" warnings
3. ✅ Located query at app/db/queries.py:145 missing index
Suggestion: Add index on email field in users table.
You: Create migration file and execute
Claude:
✅ Created migrations/add_email_index.sql
✅ Executed migration: psql -f migrations/add_email_index.sql
✅ Verified: EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '...'
✅ CPU usage returned to normal
Problem solved!Cost Analysis:
- Claude Code (included in Claude Pro): $20/month
- Codex CLI + DeepSeek: ~$5/month
- Total: $20-25/month
Tech Leaders / Architects
Core Needs:
- Code review
- Architecture design discussions
- Automatic documentation generation
- Team collaboration and knowledge sharing
Recommended Combo:
| Tool | Purpose | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor | Code writing, review | $20/month |
| GitHub Copilot Business | Unified team tool + audit | $19/month/person |
| AGENTS.md | Define team AI coding standards | Free |
AGENTS.md Example:
# Team AI Coding Standards
## Architecture Patterns
- Use clean architecture (Controller → Service → Repository)
- Follow SOLID principles
- Prefer composition over inheritance
## Code Style
- TypeScript strict mode enabled
- Use functional components (React)
- Avoid `any` type, always use specific types
## Testing
- Unit test coverage > 80%
- Use Jest + Testing Library
- Mock external APIs
## Documentation
- All public APIs must have JSDoc
- README includes setup instructions and examples
- Architecture diagrams in /docs/architecture
## Security
- Never commit secrets (.env in .gitignore)
- Use environment variables for config
- Validate all user inputsWorkflow Example:
Scenario: Code Review
Step 1: Use Cursor to review PR
"Analyze this PR, check:
1. Does it follow team coding standards (refer to AGENTS.md)
2. Are there security vulnerabilities
3. Are tests missing
4. Any performance issues"
Step 2: Cursor generates review report
"Found the following issues:
1. ❌ app/api/users.py:23 - Direct SQL concatenation, injection risk
2. ❌ Missing unit tests
3. ⚠️ Function process_data() exceeds 50 lines, suggest splitting
4. ✅ Type hints complete
5. ✅ Documentation complete"
Step 3: Auto-generate improvement suggestions
"Generate fix code:
1. Use Parameterized Query instead of string concatenation
2. Generate test case template"Cost Analysis (10-person team):
- Option 1 (Cursor): $20/month × 10 = $200/month
- Option 2 (Copilot Business): $19/month × 10 = $190/month
- Recommend Copilot Business (unified management, audit logs, GitHub native integration)
Students / Budget-Limited Individual Developers
Core Needs:
- Free as much as possible
- Learning programming
- Quickly validate ideas
Recommended Combo (Completely Free):
| Tool | Purpose | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Trae | AI assistance in IDE | Free (2M tokens/month) |
| Gemini CLI | Quick queries in terminal | Free (1500/day) |
| v0 | UI component generation | Free (200 credits/month) |
| bolt.new | Full-stack prototypes | Free (5 times/day) |
Workflow Example:
Project: Develop a personal blog
Step 1: Generate initial project with bolt.new
"Create a Next.js blog with Markdown articles, tag categories, search"
→ Get complete project in 5 minutes
Step 2: Download project locally
Click "Download" → Unzip
Step 3: Continue development in VS Code + Trae
- Install Trae extension
- "Add dark mode toggle"
- "Add article reading time estimation"
- "Optimize mobile styles"
Step 4: Use v0 for UI components
- "Generate article card component showing title, excerpt, cover, tags"
- Copy code to project
Step 5: Use Gemini CLI for quick queries in terminal
gemini "How to configure sitemap.xml in Next.js?"Cost Analysis:
- Total: $0/month
- Limits:
- Trae 2M tokens/month (about 400 GPT-4o conversations)
- v0 200 credits/month (about 40 generations)
- bolt.new 5 generations/day
- Gemini CLI 1500 requests/day
Is Free Quota Enough?
For learning and small projects, absolutely!
- Trae 2M tokens = ~13 complex conversations/day (GPT-4o basis)
- v0 200 credits = 10 components/week
- If not enough, upgrade to Windsurf Pro ($10/month) for best value
By Scenario Selection
Scenario 1: Rapid Product Idea Validation (MVP)
Need: Build a demo-ready prototype in 3 days
Recommended Tools:
- bolt.new (generate complete app)
- v0 (optimize UI)
- Replit AI (quick deployment)
Process:
Day 1: Generate project skeleton with bolt.new (2 hours)
Day 2: Continue development in Replit (6 hours)
Day 3: Beautify UI with v0 + deploy (4 hours)
Total: 12 hours (vs traditional 80+ hours)Scenario 2: Legacy Code Maintenance
Need: Understand unfamiliar codebase, quickly fix bugs
Recommended Tools:
- Cursor (codebase indexing + Agent refactoring)
- Claude Code (quick terminal modifications)
Process:
Step 1: Open project in Cursor
"Analyze this project's architecture and core modules"
Step 2: Locate bug
"Where could this error be? [paste error log]"
Step 3: Auto-fix
"Fix this bug and generate test cases"
Step 4: Verify
Run tests, confirm fixScenario 3: Team Collaboration Development
Need: 5-person team, unified tools and standards
Recommended Tools:
- GitHub Copilot Business (unified platform + audit)
- AGENTS.md (team standards)
- Replit AI (pair programming/code review)
Management Advantages:
- Unified billing (per-seat)
- Code not used for model training
- Audit logs (who used how much AI)
- IP protection (enterprise version)
Scenario 4: Open Source Project Contribution
Need: Quickly understand project, submit PRs
Recommended Tools:
- Cline (free, open-source friendly)
- Gemini CLI (free, long context for project understanding)
Process:
# Step 1: Clone project
git clone https://github.com/xxx/project.git
cd project
# Step 2: Understand project with Gemini CLI
gemini "Summarize this project's architecture" --context "$(find . -name '*.py' | head -50 | xargs cat)"
# Step 3: Develop new feature with Cline
cline "Implement Issue #123: add avatar upload feature"
# Step 4: Submit PR
git commit -am "feat: add avatar upload"
git pushRecommended "Beginner Starter Pack"
Phase 1: Free Experience (Weeks 1-2)
Goal: Zero-cost AI coding experience, understand workflow
Tool Combo:
- Trae (IDE)
- Gemini CLI (Terminal)
- v0 (UI generation)
- bolt.new (Full-stack prototyping)
Learning Tasks:
1. Generate a TODO app with bolt.new
2. Generate 5 different UI components with v0
3. Complete 10 AI conversation coding sessions in TraePhase 2: Paid Upgrade (Weeks 3-4)
Goal: Deep usage, 5× efficiency boost
Tool Choice (pick one):
- Option A: Windsurf Pro ($10/month, best value)
- Option B: Cursor Hobby + Claude Pro ($20/month, most powerful)
Learning Tasks:
1. Develop a complete full-stack app with Agent mode
2. Use AGENTS.md / .cursorrules to customize AI behavior
3. Try multi-file refactoring, auto-generate testsPhase 3: Tool Matrix (Month 2+)
Goal: Switch tools by scenario, achieve professional-level efficiency
Tool Matrix:
- Daily coding: Cursor / Windsurf
- Server ops: Claude Code
- Quick queries: Gemini CLI / Codex CLI
- UI design: v0
- Prototype validation: bolt.new
Advanced Learning:
1. Integrate MCP tools (GitHub, database, search)
2. Write custom Skills
3. Explore local models (Ollama + Cline)Cost Optimization Strategies
Strategy 1: Tiered Model Usage
Simple tasks → Cheap models (DeepSeek, GPT-4o-mini)
Complex tasks → Premium models (GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4.6 Sonnet)
Implementation:
- Codex CLI: Switch --model parameter
- Cline: Configure multiple API Keys, switch manuallyCost Comparison:
All GPT-4o: $50/month
Tiered usage: $10/month (80% savings)Strategy 2: Leverage Free Quotas
| Platform | Free Quota | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Google AI Studio | 1500/day (Gemini 2.5 Flash) | $45/month |
| Trae | 2M tokens/month | $30/month |
| v0 | 200 credits/month | $10/month |
| bolt.new | 5 times/day | $15/month |
| Total | - | ~$100/month equivalent |
Strategy: Use free quotas before considering paid options
Strategy 3: Team Shared Subscription
Scenario: 5-person small team
Option A (Individual subscriptions):
Cursor Pro × 5 = $100/month
Option B (Shared + On-demand):
- 2 people subscribe Cursor Pro (core developers): $40/month
- 3 people use Trae + Gemini CLI (free): $0/month
- Shared Claude Pro account (terminal tools): $20/month
Total: $60/month (40% savings)Final Recommendation Matrix
| Role | Budget $0 | Budget $10-20 | Budget $40+ | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontend | Trae + v0 | Windsurf + v0 | Cursor Pro + v0 Pro | Copilot Business |
| Backend | Trae + Gemini CLI | Cursor Hobby + Claude Code | Cursor Pro + Claude Pro | Copilot Enterprise |
| Full-stack | Trae + bolt.new | Cursor Hobby | Cursor Pro + bolt.new Pro | Copilot Business |
| DevOps | Gemini CLI + Codex CLI | Claude Code | Claude Code + MCP Tools | Copilot + Custom MCP |
| Student | Trae + All Free Tools | Windsurf Pro | - | - |
Hands-On Practice (Practice)
Task: Install and try recommended tools for 15 minutes based on your role
Steps:
1. Identify Your Role
Choose the best match below:
- [ ] Frontend developer (mainly React/Vue etc.)
- [ ] Backend developer (mainly API/database)
- [ ] Full-stack developer (both frontend and backend)
- [ ] DevOps/SRE (ops, deployment, monitoring)
- [ ] Student/beginner (learning programming)
2. Check Your Recommended Solution
Based on the "Final Recommendation Matrix" above, find the tools for your role and budget.
3. Install First Tool (5 minutes)
If choosing Cursor:
# macOS
Download: https://cursor.sh
Install and login (Google/GitHub)
# Create test project
mkdir ai-test
cd ai-test
cursor .If choosing Windsurf:
# Download: https://windsurf.ai
# Install and login
# Create test project
mkdir ai-test
cd ai-test
windsurf .If choosing Trae:
# Install Trae extension in VS Code
# 1. Open VS Code
# 2. Extensions → Search "Trae"
# 3. Install → Reload
# Create test project
mkdir ai-test
cd ai-test
code .4. Try First AI Task (10 minutes)
Task: Let AI help you write an HTTP API
Input in AI Chat (Cursor/Windsurf/Trae all have):
Create an Express.js API with:
1. GET /health - Health check
2. GET /users - Get user list (return mock data)
3. POST /users - Create user (accept name and email)
Requirements:
- Use TypeScript
- Add error handling
- Add request loggingObserve AI performance:
- ✅ How many files generated?
- ✅ Code quality?
- ✅ Can it run directly?
5. Run and Test
# Install dependencies (AI may have generated package.json)
npm install
# Run
npm run dev
# Test (open new terminal)
curl http://localhost:3000/health
curl http://localhost:3000/users6. Try Iteration (if time allows)
Continue conversation:
"Add data validation: email must be valid format"
"Add unit tests"
"Add Swagger documentation"7. Record Your Experience
Note in notebook:
- ✅ Which feature most useful?
- ❓ What problems encountered?
- 💡 Any improvement suggestions?
- 💰 Worth paying for?
Summary (Reflection)
- What it solved: No longer confused about "which tool to choose", get clear answers based on role, scenario, budget
- What it didn't solve: Know the tools, but don't know how to use them well—need to learn "context engineering" techniques to make AI understand your needs more accurately (Chapter 6)
- Key Points:
- No "best" tool, only "most suitable" combination
- Beginner recommendation: Trae (free) → Windsurf Pro ($10) → Cursor Pro ($20)
- Frontend first choice: Cursor/Windsurf + v0
- Backend first choice: Cursor + Claude Code
- Full-stack first choice: Cursor Agent mode
- DevOps first choice: Claude Code + Codex CLI
- Enterprise first choice: GitHub Copilot Business/Enterprise
- Budget-limited: Trae + Gemini CLI + v0 (completely free)
- Cost optimization: Tiered model usage, leverage free quotas, team shared subscriptions
- Next step: Learn how to provide better context for higher-quality AI-generated code
Last updated: 2026-02-20